|
Dear Neighbors,
With Election Day quickly approaching, we have all heard
quite a lot about the Presidential Election, and
frankly, most of us are more than ready for it to be over. However,
such a big election tends to crowd out other important elections. So I thought I
would share my thoughts on three other important races
and the two ballot questions that you will see on
Tuesday. Lumberton
Township Committee First and foremost, there are two seats on Lumberton
Township Committee on Tuesday's ballot. It is not a
secret that I whole heartedly support Lew Jackson and Mike Petty. When selecting
local candidates, I think it is important to look at
three things - professional experience, desire to be
involved, and vision for the community.
Professional experience is important because Township
Committee is a management job. Committee members
deal with budgets, the law, planning, personnel matters,
and customer service. Desire for the job is
important as well because Township Committee is
essentially a volunteer position with a small stipend. You have to want
to do it and make the time in your life for the
job. Finally, views on government and vision for
the community are important because the Township
Committee has a lot of influence on shaping the
municipal government and the future of Lumberton. In all three areas, Lew Jackson and Mike Petty are top quality choices. Lew Jackson is an experienced private
practice attorney who has served as the Assistant County Prosecutor. He
has also served for several years on the Township's
Ethics Board. Lew Jackson has been active in the
Lion's Club, his church and has lived in Lumberton for
22 years. Mike
Petty is a retired Air Force officer with a MBA. Mike serves on the Land
Development Board and Recreation Commission. He
has been a fixture on the sidelines of his kids' sports
games for years. Although Lew Jackson and Mike
Petty may differ with me on various items or priorities,
they share my overall view that
in tough times, government has to live within its means just like families and
businesses do. They know that these circumstances
make for difficult and sometimes unpopular choices, but
they understand that failing to make the hard decisions
only makes the problems bigger in the long run.
US Congress (NJ-3rd District)
On Tuesday, we will go to the polls and will more likely
than not elect our Congressman for the next 20 years. For the past
20+ years, Lumberton has been well served by Congressman Jim Saxton.
When downtown Lumberton flooded in 2007, Senator Mendendez led a fact finding
visit to Lumberton a few weeks later. In contrast, Congressman Saxton
called my office the day after the flood to tell me that he arranged for the
FEMA Director for the Northeast Region to be in Lumberton the next day to answer all our
questions. The purpose of this example is not to undercut the
effort of Senator Mendendez because I appreciate the Senator's efforts both after the
flood and his follow up to date. Rather the point is to illustrate,
that Congressman Saxton who lives in neighboring Mount Holly is in tune with the
needs of Lumberton.
This year, our choices for
Congress are
State Senator John Adler from Cherry Hill and Medford Mayor Chris
Myers. Flooding is still a big threat to Lumberton residents
along the creek and in other low lying areas. Chris Myers is well aware of this
since Medford has struggled with the same challenges. However, for most residents of
Lumberton the biggest challenge we face in the next 10 years is going to be
where to put 368 low income houses that Trenton is imposing upon Lumberton, how
to pay the almost $50 million price tag, and where to put the new school
required to educate the 400-500 more children that come with the low income
housing.
State Senator John Adler voted for most of these new
low income housing rules
and has been a strong supporter of Governor Corzine's efforts to force more low
income housing into the suburbs. In contrast,
Mayor Chris Myers has been an even more vocal opponent of these new low income
housing mandates than I have been. Medford is a co-plaintiff along with Lumberton and
numerous other municipalities against the state to prevent this massive tax
increase and community altering mandates from Trenton.
For this
reason alone, I would support Chris Myers for Congress, and
strongly oppose promoting John Adler. However, I also support Chris Myers
and oppose John Adler for other reasons. I
have known Chris Myers for a number of years. He is an intelligent, energetic and
ethical public servant. He understands that the interests of the taxpayers come
first and not those of the government establishment. It may seem simple,
but too often elected officials serve their own needs and not the common
good. Again, the contrast with John Adler is very clear. According
to several news accounts, John Adler has been in the center of the Trenton slush fund
controversy where tax money for special projects was steered to Democrat interests without a
vote. These secret arrangements by the urban center elected officials
only serve to take more and more tax money out the
suburbs like Lumberton and put them into the cities and
other Democrat strong holds. For these reasons, I
am strongly supporting Chris Myers for Congress.
Burlington
County Freeholders and Clerk I
am not going to spend much time on this race because it
really is a no brainer. Last week, the Courier Post
said what those of us who have lived in the county and
see how other counties are run have known for a long
time. The Courier Post said - "Burlington
County is well run." This is not something you
often hear about government, but in Burlington County's
case, it is true. This is due in large part to the
leadership of Freeholder Director Aubrey Fenton and his
running mate Stacey Jordan. Burlington County cut taxes this past year.
Burlington County was one of only two counties in
the state to do so. Plus, Burlington County
has steadily improved county services like the county
park and library system. Under the current county
leadership, Burlington County is the national leader in
open space and farmland preservation. Moreover,
the current board of
Freeholders has been good to Lumberton. They have
made cleaning up the debris in the Rancocas Creek a
priority which will benefit
Lumberton. They initiated at our request for a
smart growth planning initiative for the Route 38
corridor like the one they successfully implemented for
the Route 130 corridor. For these reasons, I am
supporting Aubrey Fenton and Stacey Jordan for
Freeholder and Gary Wooden for County Clerk. Ballot
Question 1 - Voters to Approve State Authority
Bonds Payable From State Appropriations This
ballot question is a shame, but I am going to vote for
it anyway because it is a partial step towards what is
already in the State Constitution, but the courts have
failed to enforce. Years
back, the New Jersey voters approved a ballot
initiative to modify the state constitution to require
voter approval for the issuance of any new state
debt. However, successive administrations in
Trenton asserted that this did not apply to state
created and appointed authorities like the Turnpike
Commission, Board of Public Utilities, School
Construction Corporation, and etc. To the dismay
of many, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed
that these state created and appointed agencies are not
part of the state so over the past decade or so New
Jersey has racked up quite a large amount of debt
without voter approval. This
ballot question extends the requirement for voter
approval for issuance of new debt by state agencies but
leaves an exemption for agencies that can designate
another non-tax source of revenue such as fees or tolls. Opponents
of the amendment cite this as a huge loophole, which it
is. Opponents also assert that if this change
passes, the state will be able to refinance pervious
debt that the courts have ruled taxpayer do not have to
pay thus obligating the taxpayer. I
agree 100% with the opponents of the amendment. However,
the public agencies are already borrowing without voter
approval. A partial step to make it a little harder
to do so is not a solution, but it is an
improvement. Also, the notion that NJ taxpayers
ultimately will not have to foot the bill for $37
billion of non voter approved borrowing is naive.
It is analogous to thinking that federal taxpayers would
not have had to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac when
they failed last month. So
in short, a partial step in the right direction is
better than no step at all so I will be voting in favor
of Question #1. Ballot
Question 2 - Method of Selection of Municipal Court
Judges This
question is a little more straight forward. Under
the NJ Constitution, if two or more municipalities share
a municipal court, the Governor gets to appoint the
judge. In a town, like Lumberton, that has its own
court, the governing body appoints the judge. The
loss of control over the appointment is seen by some in
the shared services movement as an impediment to sharing
of municipal courts. This amendment allows the
state legislature to permit the municipalities to
appoint the judge when a court is shared by two or more
municipalities. I
am always supportive of changes that provide local
governments more latitude to improve government
efficiency. This amendment will do that for some,
but not most municipalities. Accordingly, I am
supporting this initiative as well. I
hope you found this issue informative. Please
remember to vote on Tuesday, November 4th. Many
of the polling locations have changed since the last
Presidential Election. To see where you vote, you
can look it up on a map at http://www.lumbertontwp.com/Portals/12/Government_docs/CNH-VotingDistMap.pdf. Finally,
please stay tuned to your inbox for the election results
on Election night. I will send them out as
soon as I get them. As always, please continue to share this with your
friends and neighbors in town and thanks for your
support.
Pat Delany
Founder & Editor
122 Kingsbridge Drive
Lumberton, NJ 08048
(609) 560-8045
|